By Gregory Baremblitt
The Israeli - Palestinian conflict is one of the problems but cruel, sad and insoluble Middle East and possibly the world.
The Palestinian people want to return to what was an important part of its territory occupied by Israel after a war against several Arab countries that Israel did not start and had the bad luck to win. The Palestinians intend to found a state, whose headquarters would be in a room dominated by Israel in Jerusalem, and in one of which places the Israelites are building a temple. Israel is a nation founded by the World Zionist Movement, awarded by a UN protectorate of the United Kingdom as reparation for the murder of six million Jews by the Nazis in World War II and many more in the Diaspora (resulting from former expulsion of Jews from their country by the Roman Empire.) Apparently, the UN compensation to the Palestinian community by the "concession" from their domains.
Israel is a nation with their own state and a democratically elected government in a lawsuit poly favor with other progressives and conservatives, and especially religious. The Palestinian people was always a semi-nomadic people (who never had a state), and currently has a government-recognized for their community, the Palestinian Authority, and also partially dominated by two guerrilla movements of resistance, "about terrorists: Al Fatah and Hammas.
Shortly after its founding, Israel was attacked repeatedly by partnerships between the Palestinian and other Arab countries endowed with numerous armed forces. In almost all cases, as already proposed in the so-called Gaza Strip and the West Bank, Israel emerged victorious and expanded its original territory by invading the Palestinian and Arab territories. During a lake and historical period endless negotiations, Israel signed peace treaties with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other Arab countries, but several others (Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan), the situation remained unstable or downright hostile.
years ago, Israel allowed the entry and exit, free transit, stay and work for the Palestinians to "their" territory. As that Israel was building settlements in the former colonized Palestinian territory and that Hammas and Fatah responded with suicide bombings and shooting missiles equipped with the necessary reach to explode in Israeli towns causing some casualties, Israel imposed increasing restrictions on the Palestinians. The Palestinian organizations and their allies, in turn retaliated with military operations varied, causing numerous deaths and injuries in Israeli cities against which Israel built a wall separating the two populations and to carefully monitor passenger entry and exit of Palestinians. Israel maintains numerous Palestinian prisoners of war and the rights "granted" to the Palestinians within Israeli territory fell dramatically and the security of military or foreign civilians in Palestinian territory, acquired a high degree of danger to them. It is generally held that the disproportionate Israeli retaliation, though Israel says their attacks on Palestinian civilians are unfortunate but inevitable, to the extent that the Palestinian terrorist forces are not a regular army and used civilians as shields and weapons. For their part, overtly Palestinian forces do not differentiate between civilians and military objectives of destroying Israel.
is known that Israel is the main commercial and military ally of the United States in the Middle East and it is highly likely that much of the Arab and other countries of the region, Palestinians are a kind of ally advanced anti-Zionist resistance, anti Israeli and anti-Semitic, explicitly or not, against the West (said in a very broad sense, because countries Russia, China, and Asia Minor) are anti-Israel. That enmity, (also explicitly or not) has much to do with the alliance Israel - USA.
Numerous Middle Eastern countries, obviously or not, help the Palestinians do more with weapons than food, drugs, acceptance of Palestinian immigration etc in their national territories. The Palestinians, crushed in the game between the blocks "friends" and enemies, are very poor people, suffering appalling hardships and survives crammed in squalid camps in exile, it is impossible not to note that this occurs within a sub continent of "sympathetic "an enormous amount of land and oil wealth. Obviously, what Israel is for the U.S., the Palestinians are for a complex and dark block, whether supporters of the pan-Arab or not. In this block should not help the Palestinians in ways that "solve" their needs and at risk of warm up as eternal enemies of Israel. Moreover, terrorist organizations such as the one led by Osana Bin Laden are strongly anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic and support in various ways to Palestinian terrorists.
general opinion is that Israel is already a nuclear power, ie possessing arms for that condition. The same applies, more clearly, with Pakistan. As you know, the president of Iran (Country that seems to be actively seeking to build nuclear weapons) has stated that his country's political principles include "turn off" the state of Israel from the face of the Earth, as agreed with Fatah and countless movements in the Middle East .
This more than synthetic review of the painful Israeli-Palestinian conflict is nothing more than a framework for strategic military an assumption, which in turn is less than the beginning of a deep reflection about what would happen in the Middle East if Israel, Iran or any other power, directly or indirectly involved in the in-store ... resolved to shoot one of several "Atomic bombs" against one of the two main opponents of that conflict.
As this letter is a "thrust" is just a "touch" that seeks to analyze and more surprisingly, much less resolve the issues concerned, I justify the answer to both simplistic and enigmatic to the previous question.
would happen if a nuclear weapon was used in that war? The answer I think is plausible: NOTHING! STRONGLY ... NOTHING! "Nothing that is not, of course, the huge pan-genocide of people living in hyper-populated cities next to each other. NADA, in the sense that an atomic punishment immediately.
Argument to support this hypothesis TERRIBLE applies to any situation where a country or sector saw tempted to launch a nuclear attack by the insane or accidental reasons whatsoever.
The atomic retaliation in a globalized world in which falsely feuds (whether uni-national and between blocks explicit or not), stay current and constantly renewed, is almost certainly unworkable. This gives rise to a paradox monstrusa. Say surprisingly, in this situation, (to paraphrase the famous proverb "one swallow does not make the summer ... but both do a hell") the danger of a pandemic atom is much more likely than you think. And so assumption holds for the global conventional armed retaliation against the offender mass coordinate ... because, surely, "Who threw a rock ... he has others in his pocket." That is, in the above situation, nothing would happen because anything can happen. And such a thing is worth more to a second attack for the former. Nobody
a popular Argentine poet, author of tango lyrics, Armando Discépolo has coined the qualifier for the world today:
- "The world if it is a crap ... I know ..." -
Obviously this is not the author of these lines refer, nor the charges and the atomic retaliation, otherwise (That is the opposite of that?), just to show that the nuclear arms race based on the explosive superiority is not just a bluff accident, but a double bluff, that if there is in the game of poker, it would be invent.
The Israeli - Palestinian conflict is one of the problems but cruel, sad and insoluble Middle East and possibly the world.
The Palestinian people want to return to what was an important part of its territory occupied by Israel after a war against several Arab countries that Israel did not start and had the bad luck to win. The Palestinians intend to found a state, whose headquarters would be in a room dominated by Israel in Jerusalem, and in one of which places the Israelites are building a temple. Israel is a nation founded by the World Zionist Movement, awarded by a UN protectorate of the United Kingdom as reparation for the murder of six million Jews by the Nazis in World War II and many more in the Diaspora (resulting from former expulsion of Jews from their country by the Roman Empire.) Apparently, the UN compensation to the Palestinian community by the "concession" from their domains.
Israel is a nation with their own state and a democratically elected government in a lawsuit poly favor with other progressives and conservatives, and especially religious. The Palestinian people was always a semi-nomadic people (who never had a state), and currently has a government-recognized for their community, the Palestinian Authority, and also partially dominated by two guerrilla movements of resistance, "about terrorists: Al Fatah and Hammas.
Shortly after its founding, Israel was attacked repeatedly by partnerships between the Palestinian and other Arab countries endowed with numerous armed forces. In almost all cases, as already proposed in the so-called Gaza Strip and the West Bank, Israel emerged victorious and expanded its original territory by invading the Palestinian and Arab territories. During a lake and historical period endless negotiations, Israel signed peace treaties with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other Arab countries, but several others (Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan), the situation remained unstable or downright hostile.
years ago, Israel allowed the entry and exit, free transit, stay and work for the Palestinians to "their" territory. As that Israel was building settlements in the former colonized Palestinian territory and that Hammas and Fatah responded with suicide bombings and shooting missiles equipped with the necessary reach to explode in Israeli towns causing some casualties, Israel imposed increasing restrictions on the Palestinians. The Palestinian organizations and their allies, in turn retaliated with military operations varied, causing numerous deaths and injuries in Israeli cities against which Israel built a wall separating the two populations and to carefully monitor passenger entry and exit of Palestinians. Israel maintains numerous Palestinian prisoners of war and the rights "granted" to the Palestinians within Israeli territory fell dramatically and the security of military or foreign civilians in Palestinian territory, acquired a high degree of danger to them. It is generally held that the disproportionate Israeli retaliation, though Israel says their attacks on Palestinian civilians are unfortunate but inevitable, to the extent that the Palestinian terrorist forces are not a regular army and used civilians as shields and weapons. For their part, overtly Palestinian forces do not differentiate between civilians and military objectives of destroying Israel.
is known that Israel is the main commercial and military ally of the United States in the Middle East and it is highly likely that much of the Arab and other countries of the region, Palestinians are a kind of ally advanced anti-Zionist resistance, anti Israeli and anti-Semitic, explicitly or not, against the West (said in a very broad sense, because countries Russia, China, and Asia Minor) are anti-Israel. That enmity, (also explicitly or not) has much to do with the alliance Israel - USA.
Numerous Middle Eastern countries, obviously or not, help the Palestinians do more with weapons than food, drugs, acceptance of Palestinian immigration etc in their national territories. The Palestinians, crushed in the game between the blocks "friends" and enemies, are very poor people, suffering appalling hardships and survives crammed in squalid camps in exile, it is impossible not to note that this occurs within a sub continent of "sympathetic "an enormous amount of land and oil wealth. Obviously, what Israel is for the U.S., the Palestinians are for a complex and dark block, whether supporters of the pan-Arab or not. In this block should not help the Palestinians in ways that "solve" their needs and at risk of warm up as eternal enemies of Israel. Moreover, terrorist organizations such as the one led by Osana Bin Laden are strongly anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic and support in various ways to Palestinian terrorists.
general opinion is that Israel is already a nuclear power, ie possessing arms for that condition. The same applies, more clearly, with Pakistan. As you know, the president of Iran (Country that seems to be actively seeking to build nuclear weapons) has stated that his country's political principles include "turn off" the state of Israel from the face of the Earth, as agreed with Fatah and countless movements in the Middle East .
This more than synthetic review of the painful Israeli-Palestinian conflict is nothing more than a framework for strategic military an assumption, which in turn is less than the beginning of a deep reflection about what would happen in the Middle East if Israel, Iran or any other power, directly or indirectly involved in the in-store ... resolved to shoot one of several "Atomic bombs" against one of the two main opponents of that conflict.
As this letter is a "thrust" is just a "touch" that seeks to analyze and more surprisingly, much less resolve the issues concerned, I justify the answer to both simplistic and enigmatic to the previous question.
would happen if a nuclear weapon was used in that war? The answer I think is plausible: NOTHING! STRONGLY ... NOTHING! "Nothing that is not, of course, the huge pan-genocide of people living in hyper-populated cities next to each other. NADA, in the sense that an atomic punishment immediately.
Argument to support this hypothesis TERRIBLE applies to any situation where a country or sector saw tempted to launch a nuclear attack by the insane or accidental reasons whatsoever.
The atomic retaliation in a globalized world in which falsely feuds (whether uni-national and between blocks explicit or not), stay current and constantly renewed, is almost certainly unworkable. This gives rise to a paradox monstrusa. Say surprisingly, in this situation, (to paraphrase the famous proverb "one swallow does not make the summer ... but both do a hell") the danger of a pandemic atom is much more likely than you think. And so assumption holds for the global conventional armed retaliation against the offender mass coordinate ... because, surely, "Who threw a rock ... he has others in his pocket." That is, in the above situation, nothing would happen because anything can happen. And such a thing is worth more to a second attack for the former. Nobody
a popular Argentine poet, author of tango lyrics, Armando Discépolo has coined the qualifier for the world today:
- "The world if it is a crap ... I know ..." -
Obviously this is not the author of these lines refer, nor the charges and the atomic retaliation, otherwise (That is the opposite of that?), just to show that the nuclear arms race based on the explosive superiority is not just a bluff accident, but a double bluff, that if there is in the game of poker, it would be invent.