By Gregory Baremblitt
The "old fashioned" remember that when Marx defined in "Capital" of surplus value relative and absolute, it does so in relation to labor input measure performance for hours and not paid by the owner of the means of production.
This is a fascinating subject, especially when authors post modern coup was "agreed" to conceptualize that there is a difference between physical labor and intellectual (whom they call. Amiss, immaterial). I say "agreed" because Marx never ceased to point out that difference and distinction of working arrangements and salary etc involved.
When it comes to deploy, or support, or to develop self-governed enterprises through direct democratic governance (councils, assemblies etc.) Among the many objections that appear, are some that are older que el capitalismo. La más común es la de atribuir la bajas productividades a la “pérdida de tiempo“ de las “ interminables asambleas” y a la “obsesión por el consenso”. Cabe reconocer que eso a menudo ocurre y que por ésa y otras miles de causas, a menudo la comunidad auto-gestionaria no consigue competir con las corporaciones capitalistas o de Estado.
La explicación y la justificación de ésa diferencia, esa aparente “inferioridad” auto-gestionaria casi siempre de debe al “doble objetivo” del trabajo en régimen auto-gestionario. En la autogestión no se trata apenas de optimizar cuantitativa y cualitativamente los resultados del proceso de trabajo. It is not ever separate that objective in loco production of subjectivities democratic, libertarian, supportive, fraternal, fair. If the same work to generate products that goods do not also criticize and invent constantly working relationships, leadership, strategy, compensation, made decisions, procedures, premises, instruments, performance levels, relaxation, fun, security, pesquiza and so on. INSPIRATION THAT IS LOST IN TIME GAME TIME WHEN THE WORK IS NOT FOR LIFE, BUT THE LIFE (not just alienated labor), BUT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF DEATH IN THE WORKPLACE. MORE THAN PLAY SIMPLE OR EXTENDED CAPITAL, IS A DEATH INVEST LABOR streamlined.
This is a fascinating subject, especially when authors post modern coup was "agreed" to conceptualize that there is a difference between physical labor and intellectual (whom they call. Amiss, immaterial). I say "agreed" because Marx never ceased to point out that difference and distinction of working arrangements and salary etc involved.
When it comes to deploy, or support, or to develop self-governed enterprises through direct democratic governance (councils, assemblies etc.) Among the many objections that appear, are some that are older que el capitalismo. La más común es la de atribuir la bajas productividades a la “pérdida de tiempo“ de las “ interminables asambleas” y a la “obsesión por el consenso”. Cabe reconocer que eso a menudo ocurre y que por ésa y otras miles de causas, a menudo la comunidad auto-gestionaria no consigue competir con las corporaciones capitalistas o de Estado.
La explicación y la justificación de ésa diferencia, esa aparente “inferioridad” auto-gestionaria casi siempre de debe al “doble objetivo” del trabajo en régimen auto-gestionario. En la autogestión no se trata apenas de optimizar cuantitativa y cualitativamente los resultados del proceso de trabajo. It is not ever separate that objective in loco production of subjectivities democratic, libertarian, supportive, fraternal, fair. If the same work to generate products that goods do not also criticize and invent constantly working relationships, leadership, strategy, compensation, made decisions, procedures, premises, instruments, performance levels, relaxation, fun, security, pesquiza and so on. INSPIRATION THAT IS LOST IN TIME GAME TIME WHEN THE WORK IS NOT FOR LIFE, BUT THE LIFE (not just alienated labor), BUT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF DEATH IN THE WORKPLACE. MORE THAN PLAY SIMPLE OR EXTENDED CAPITAL, IS A DEATH INVEST LABOR streamlined.